{"id":5863,"date":"2023-06-04T14:50:57","date_gmt":"2023-06-04T21:50:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/?p=5863"},"modified":"2023-06-04T15:02:42","modified_gmt":"2023-06-04T22:02:42","slug":"the-statue-and-its-discontents","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/the-statue-and-its-discontents\/","title":{"rendered":"The Statue and Its Discontents"},"content":{"rendered":"

Monumental mistakes?<\/span> The Statue and Its Discontents<\/strong><\/span><\/h1>\n

Lecture and panel discussion with Jeanette Kohl and Malcolm Baker, Universit\u00e4t Hamburg, June 8, 2023.<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
\n
\n

\"HIASFor those concerned with the history of sculpture Robert Musil\u2019s remark that \u201cThere is nothing in this world as invisible as a monument\u201d has, alas, always rung very true.<\/p>\n

But suddenly over the past three years, everyone is talking about statues. Except they are not. Instead, they are talking about the subjects these statues represent and the culpability of these historical figures for involvement in the slave trade and other crimes of various colonial pasts.<\/p>\n

But in this talk four art historians will focus on an aspect of the current debate about statues that has received much less attention.  This is the question about how statues work as representations and the roles played by the conventions and visual rhetoric they employ. How might the terms of the debate shift if more attention was paid to the aesthetics of the statue? Is there an opportunity to think about the aesthetics and politics of the monument together?<\/p>\n

Participants<\/span><\/p>\n