{"id":4499,"date":"2020-02-18T11:04:06","date_gmt":"2020-02-18T19:04:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/?p=4499"},"modified":"2020-02-24T11:44:25","modified_gmt":"2020-02-24T19:44:25","slug":"woven-silk-as-embodiment-tapestry-and-imperial-portraiture-at-the-yuan-court-from-a-mongol-perspective","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/woven-silk-as-embodiment-tapestry-and-imperial-portraiture-at-the-yuan-court-from-a-mongol-perspective\/","title":{"rendered":"Woven Silk as Embodiment:  Tapestry and Imperial Portraiture at the  Yuan Court from a Mongol Perspective"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3><b><span style=\"color: #800000;\">Woven Silk as Embodiment: Tapestry and Imperial Portraiture at the&nbsp;Yuan Court from a Mongol Perspective <\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #800000;\">Yong Cho, Ph.D. Candidate, Yale University<\/span><br \/>\n<\/b><\/h3>\n<p>Thursday, February 20, 2020 at 5:00pm<br \/>\nARTS Seminar Room 333<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-4500 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/ChoFlyer20-232x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"404\" height=\"523\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/ChoFlyer20-232x300.jpg 232w, https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/ChoFlyer20-791x1024.jpg 791w, https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/ChoFlyer20-768x994.jpg 768w, https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/ChoFlyer20-1187x1536.jpg 1187w, https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/ChoFlyer20-1583x2048.jpg 1583w, https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/ChoFlyer20.jpg 1700w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 404px) 100vw, 404px\" \/><br \/>\nThe Mongol ruling house during China\u2019s Yuan dynasty (1271-1368) enshrined portrait images of deceased emperors and empresses along with tantric Buddhist mandalas intended to represent their ritual embodiments. Interestingly, these images\u2014 portraits and mandala\u2014were woven completely in silk using the technique of tapestry with slits (<i>kesi<\/i>). This was a dramatic departure from established tradition in China and North Asia, where such images were either painted or sculpted.<\/p>\n<p>What accounted for this transition in medium, with Yuan rulers opting to produce images of their own bodies as silk tapestry? Examination of the available visual and textual evidence suggests that Yuan rulers understood the process of weaving silk as an especially efficacious means to producing embodied images, where the subject was understood to be present, rather than merely represented. Evidence also shows that such woven images were a product of collaboration among artisans from different corners of the Mongol Empire \u2014a testimony to the cosmopolitan outlook of rulers who, even as they rose to power in China, did not relinquish their ties to the steppe.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Woven Silk as Embodiment: Tapestry and Imperial Portraiture at the&nbsp;Yuan Court from a Mongol Perspective Yong Cho, Ph.D. Candidate, Yale <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/woven-silk-as-embodiment-tapestry-and-imperial-portraiture-at-the-yuan-court-from-a-mongol-perspective\/\">Read More &rarr;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[103,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4499","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-and-events","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4499","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4499"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4499\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4505,"href":"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4499\/revisions\/4505"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4499"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4499"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arthistory.ucr.edu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4499"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}